Wisconsin Statutes (Last Updated: January 10, 2017) |
Chapter 968. Commencement Of Criminal Proceedings |
Section 968.20. Return of property seized.
Latest version.
- (1) Any person claiming the right to possession of property seized pursuant to a search warrant or seized without a search warrant, except for an animal taken into custody under s. 173.13 (1) or withheld from its owner under s. 173.21 (1) (a) , may apply for its return to the circuit court for the county in which the property was seized or where the search warrant was returned, except that a court may commence a hearing, on its own initiative, to return property seized under s. 968.26 .(1g) The court shall order such notice as it deems adequate to be given the district attorney and, unless notice was provided under s. 968.26 (7) , to all persons who have or may have an interest in the property. The court shall hold a hearing to hear all claims to its true ownership. If the right to possession is proved to the court's satisfaction, it shall order the property, other than contraband or property covered under sub. (1m) or (1r) or s. 173.21 (4) or 968.205 , returned if:(a) The property is not needed as evidence or, if needed, satisfactory arrangements can be made for its return for subsequent use as evidence; or(b) All proceedings and investigations in which it might be required have been completed.(1m)(a) In this subsection:1. “Crime" includes an act committed by a juvenile or by an adult who is adjudicated incompetent that would have been a crime if the act had been committed by a competent adult.2. “Dangerous weapon" has the meaning given in s. 939.22 (10) .(b) If the seized property is a dangerous weapon or ammunition, the property shall not be returned to any person who committed a crime involving the use of the dangerous weapon or the ammunition.(c) Subject to par. (d) , seized property that is a dangerous weapon or ammunition may be returned to the rightful owner under this section if the owner had no prior knowledge of and gave no consent to the commission of the crime.(d)1. If the seized property is a firearm, the property has not been returned under this section, and a person claiming the right to possession of the firearm has applied for its return under sub. (1) , the court shall order a hearing under sub. (1) to occur within 20 business days after the person applies for the return. If, at the hearing, all conditions under sub. (1) have been met and the person is not prohibited from possessing a firearm under state or federal law as determined by using information provided under s. 165.63 , the court shall, within 5 days of the completion of the hearing and using a return of firearms form developed by the director of state courts, order the property returned if one of the following has occurred:a. The district attorney has affirmatively declined to file charges in connection with the seizure against the person.b. All charges filed in connection with the seizure against the person have been dismissed.c. Ten months have passed since the seizure and no charges in connection with the seizure have been filed against the person.d. The trial court has reached final disposition for all charges in connection with the seizure and the person has not been adjudged guilty, or not guilty by reason of mental disease or defect, of a crime in connection with the seizure.e. The person has established that he or she had no prior knowledge of and gave no consent to the commission of the activity that led to the seizure.2. If an entity holding a seized firearm receives a return of firearms form, the entity shall return the firearm within 10 business days of receiving the form unless the entity determines that the person who would receive the firearm is prohibited from possessing a firearm under state or federal law. The entity shall use the information provided under s. 165.63 to aid in making the determination under this subdivision.(e) Property which may not be returned to an owner under this subsection shall be disposed of under subs. (3) and (4) .(1r)(a) If the seized property is a firearm ordered seized under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1. , 2007 stats., the court that issued that order shall order the firearm returned if the order under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1. , 2007 stats., has been canceled under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 2. or (16) (gm) , 2007 stats., or is canceled under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1m. c.(b) If the seized property is a firearm ordered seized under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1. , the court that issued that order shall order the firearm returned if the order under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1. is canceled under s. 51.20 (13) (cv) 1m. c.(c) If the seized property is a firearm ordered seized under s. 51.45 (13) (i) 1. , the court that issued that order shall order the firearm returned if the order under s. 51.45 (13) (i) 1. is canceled under s. 51.45 (13) (i) 2. c.(d) If the seized property is a firearm ordered seized under s. 54.10 (3) (f) 1. , the court that issued that order shall order the firearm returned if the order under s. 54.10 (3) (f) 1. is canceled under s. 54.10 (3) (f) 2. c.(e) If the seized property is a firearm ordered seized under s. 55.12 (10) (a) , the court that issued that order shall order the firearm returned if the order under s. 55.12 (10) (a) is canceled under s. 55.12 (10) (b) 3.(2) Property not required for evidence or use in further investigation, unless contraband or property covered under sub. (1m) or (1r) or s. 173.12 or 968.205 , may be returned by the officer to the person from whom it was seized without the requirement of a hearing.(3)(a) First class cities shall dispose of dangerous weapons or ammunition seized 12 months after taking possession of them if the owner, authorized under sub. (1m) , has not requested their return and if the dangerous weapon or ammunition is not required for evidence or use in further investigation and has not been disposed of pursuant to a court order at the completion of a criminal action or proceeding. Disposition procedures shall be established by ordinance or resolution and may include provisions authorizing an attempt to return to the rightful owner any dangerous weapons or ammunition which appear to be stolen or are reported stolen. If enacted, any such provision shall include a presumption that if the dangerous weapons or ammunition appear to be or are reported stolen an attempt will be made to return the dangerous weapons or ammunition to the authorized rightful owner. If the return of a seized dangerous weapon other than a firearm is not requested by its rightful owner under sub. (1) and is not returned by the officer under sub. (2) , the city shall safely dispose of the dangerous weapon or, if the dangerous weapon is a motor vehicle, as defined in s. 340.01 (35) , sell the motor vehicle following the procedure under s. 973.075 (4) or authorize a law enforcement agency to retain and use the motor vehicle. If the return of a seized firearm or ammunition is not requested by its authorized rightful owner under sub. (1) and is not returned by the officer under sub. (2) , the seized firearm or ammunition shall be shipped to and become property of the state crime laboratories. A person designated by the department of justice may destroy any material for which the laboratory has no use or arrange for the exchange of material with other public agencies. In lieu of destruction, shoulder weapons for which the laboratories have no use shall be turned over to the department of natural resources for sale and distribution of proceeds under s. 29.934 or for use under s. 29.938 .(b) Except as provided in par. (a) or sub. (1m) or (4) , a city, village, town or county or other custodian of a seized dangerous weapon or ammunition, if the dangerous weapon or ammunition is not required for evidence or use in further investigation and has not been disposed of pursuant to a court order at the completion of a criminal action or proceeding, shall make reasonable efforts to notify all persons who have or may have an authorized rightful interest in the dangerous weapon or ammunition of the application requirements under sub. (1) . If, within 30 days after the notice, an application under sub. (1) is not made and the seized dangerous weapon or ammunition is not returned by the officer under sub. (2) , the city, village, town or county or other custodian may retain the dangerous weapon or ammunition and authorize its use by a law enforcement agency, except that a dangerous weapon used in the commission of a homicide or a handgun, as defined in s. 175.35 (1) (b) , may not be retained. If a dangerous weapon other than a firearm is not so retained, the city, village, town or county or other custodian shall safely dispose of the dangerous weapon or, if the dangerous weapon is a motor vehicle, as defined in s. 340.01 (35) , sell the motor vehicle following the procedure under s. 973.075 (4) . If a firearm or ammunition is not so retained, the city, village, town or county or other custodian shall ship it to the state crime laboratories and it is then the property of the laboratories. A person designated by the department of justice may destroy any material for which the laboratories have no use or arrange for the exchange of material with other public agencies. In lieu of destruction, shoulder weapons for which the laboratory has no use shall be turned over to the department of natural resources for sale and distribution of proceeds under s. 29.934 or for use under s. 29.938 .(4) Any property seized, other than property covered under s. 968.205 , that poses a danger to life or other property in storage, transportation or use and that is not required for evidence or further investigation shall be safely disposed of upon command of the person in whose custody they are committed. The city, village, town or county shall by ordinance or resolution establish disposal procedures. Procedures may include provisions authorizing an attempt to return to the rightful owner substances which have a commercial value in normal business usage and do not pose an immediate threat to life or property. If enacted, any such provision shall include a presumption that if the substance appears to be or is reported stolen an attempt will be made to return the substance to the rightful owner.
1977 c. 260
;
1977 c. 449
s.
497
;
1979 c. 221
;
1981 c. 160
;
1983 a. 189
s.
329 (3)
;
1983 a. 278
;
1985 a. 29
ss.
2447
to
2449
,
3200 (35)
;
1987 a. 203
;
1987 a. 332
s.
64
;
1993 a. 90
,
196
;
1996 a. 157
;
1997 a. 192
,
248
;
1999 a. 185
;
2001 a. 16
;
2005 a. 387
,
394
;
2009 a. 258
;
2011 a. 257
s.
56
;
2015 a. 64
,
141
,
233
; s. 13.92 (2) (i).
Note
Sub. (1) is shown as affected by
2015 Wis. Acts 64
and
233
and as merged by the legislative reference bureau under s. 13.92 (2) (i).
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
Sub. (1g) (intro.) is shown as affected by
2015 Wis. Acts 64
and
233
and as merged by the legislative reference bureau under s. 13.92 (2) (i).
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
A claimant of seized property has the burden of showing that it is not contraband and is not needed as evidence in a possible retrial. Money may be applied to the payment of counsel fees. Welter v. Sauk County Clerk of Court,
53 Wis. 2d 178
,
191 N.W.2d 852
(1971).
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
Under sub. (1m) (b), “rightful owner" refers to an innocent person who owned a firearm or ammunition at the time an offense was committed. State v. Williams,
148 Wis. 2d 852
,
436 N.W.2d 924
(Ct. App. 1989).
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
Whether explicit photographs seized during the execution of a search warrant were contraband is discussed. In re Return of Property in State v. Benhoff,
185 Wis. 2d 600
,
518 N.W.2d 307
(Ct. App. 1994).
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
In the event that the district attorney elects not to bring a forfeiture action against seized property, a person seeking the return of the property may do so under this section, not s. 961.55 (3). Jones v. State,
226 Wis. 2d 565
,
594 N.W.2d 738
(1999),
97-3306
.
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
The definition of contraband in s. 968.13 applies to this section. The burden is on the state to prove by the greater weight of the credible evidence that property is contraband not subject to return under this section. Jones v. State,
226 Wis. 2d 565
,
594 N.W.2d 738
(1999),
97-3306
.
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
The term “use" in sub. (1m) (b) requires more than than the mere fact that a firearm is with a person. It must be part of the crime in some way. State v. Perez,
2000 WI App 115
,
235 Wis. 2d 238
,
612 N.W.2d 374
,
99-3108
.
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
This section establishes an in rem proceeding to establish true ownership of property. It does not authorize granting a money judgment to the rightful owner when seized property is missing or mistakenly returned to another as a judgment in an in rem proceeding is valid only against the property and not against a defendant or a defendant's assets. City of Milwaukee v. Glass,
2001 WI 61
,
243 Wis. 2d 636
,
628 N.W.2d 343
,
99-2389
.
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
Sub. (1m) (b) prohibits the return of a dangerous weapon to a person convicted of carrying a concealed and dangerous weapon. State v. Perez,
2001 WI 79
,
244 Wis. 2d 582
,
628 N.W.2d 820
,
99-3108
.
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
Sub. (1m) (b) is subject to the excessive fines clause of the 8th amendment. State v. Bergquist,
2002 WI App 39
,
250 Wis. 2d 792
,
641 N.W.2d 179
,
01-0814
.
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
Sub. (1m) (b) forbids returning weapons to one who committed a crime involving their use; it does not require that the defendant be convicted of that crime. Agreeing to a crime being read in at the time of sentencing constitutes an admission of having committed the crime. When charged with possession of a firearm by a person ordered not to possess a firearm under an injunction, a defendant need not have them literally in his hands or on premises that he occupies but must have the right to possess them. Not having contact with the weapons for several years did not establish lack of possession, especially when the defendant was allowing the firearms to appreciate for later sale. State v. Kueny,
2006 WI App 197
,
296 Wis. 2d 658
,
724 N.W. 2d 399
,
04-1291
.
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
When the defendant's conduct resulting in his conviction for disorderly conduct involved the use of a single firearm, the circuit court properly denied the defendant's motion for the return of that gun under sub. (1m) (b). However, with respect to other guns and ammunition that were seized following the incident, those items were not used in the commission of the disorderly conduct offense and sub. (1m) (b) did not bar their return. State v. Leonard,
2015 WI App 57
,
364 Wis. 2d 491
,
868 N.W.2d 186
,
14-2892
.
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
Nothing in this section provides a creditor with the right to obtain a debtor's property in a proceeding under this section. A circuit court does not have the inherent authority to take property unassociated with the crime at issue and allocate that property to itself or others solely because the police happened to have seized the unassociated property at the time of arrest. This section does not provide for equitable relief. State v. Branch,
2015 WI App 65
,
364 Wis. 2d 582
,
869 N.W.2d 542
,
14-2515
.
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
A law enforcement agency may not retain unclaimed contraband money for its own use. In the absence of an asset forfeiture proceeding initiated by the state or a judicial determination that the money constitutes contraband, a local law enforcement agency should dispose of the money as unclaimed property under s. 59.66 (2).
OAG 10-09
.
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
Due process does not require states to give detailed instructions to owners who seek the return of lawfully seized property no longer needed in a police interrogation or criminal proceeding. West Covina v. Perkins,
525 U.S. 234
, 142 L.Ed. 2d 636 (1999).
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1
This section applies although a criminal action has not been commenced; the property owner has the burden of moving for the return of the property. Supreme Video, Inc. v. Schulz,
808 F. Supp. 1380
(1992).
Microsoft Windows NT 6.1.7601 Service Pack 1