2001 a. 109
;
2011 a. 217
.
Aborting a child against a father's wishes does not constitute intentional infliction of emotional distress. Przybyla v. Przybyla,
87 Wis. 2d 441
,
275 N.W.2d 112
(Ct. App. 1978).
Sub. (2) (a) proscribes feticide. It does not apply to consensual abortions. It was not impliedly repealed by the adoption of s. 940.15 in response to
Roe v
.
Wade
. State v. Black,
188 Wis. 2d 639
,
526 N.W.2d 132
(1994).
The common law “year-and-a-day rule" that no homicide is committed unless the victim dies within a year and a day after the injury is inflicted is abrogated, with prospective application only. State v. Picotte,
2003 WI 42
,
261 Wis. 2d 249
,
661 N.W.2d 381
,
01-3063
.
This section is cited as similar to a Texas statute that was held to violate the due process clause of the 14th amendment, which protects against state action the right to privacy, including a woman's qualified right to terminate her pregnancy. Roe v. Wade,
410 U.S. 113
(1973).
The state may prohibit first trimester abortions by nonphysicians. Connecticut v. Menillo,
423 U.S. 9
(1975).
The viability of an unborn child is discussed. Colautti v. Franklin,
439 U.S. 379
(1979).
Poverty is not a constitutionally suspect classification. Encouraging childbirth except in the most urgent circumstances is rationally related to the legitimate governmental objective of protecting potential life. Harris v. McRae,
448 U.S. 297
(1980).
Abortion issues are discussed. Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive Health,
462 U.S. 416
(1983); Planned Parenthood Assn. v. Ashcroft,
462 U.S. 476
(1983); Simopoulas v. Virginia,
462 U.S. 506
(1983).
The essential holding of
Roe v. Wade
allowing abortion is upheld, but various state restrictions on abortion are permissible. Planned Parenthood v. Casey,
505 U.S. 833
,
120 L. Ed. 2d 674
(1992).
Wisconsin's abortion statute, 940.04, Stats. 1969, is unconstitutional as applied to the abortion of an embryo that has not quickened. Babbitz v. McCann,
310 F. Supp. 293
(1970).
When U.S. supreme court decisions clearly made Wisconsin's antiabortion statute unenforceable, the issue in a physician's action for injunctive relief against enforcement became mooted, and it no longer presented a case or controversy over which the court could have jurisdiction. Larkin v. McCann,
368 F. Supp. 1352
(1974).