Section 425.103. Accrual of cause of action; “default".

 

(1)  Notwithstanding any term or agreement to the contrary, no cause of action with respect to the obligation of a customer in a consumer credit transaction shall accrue in favor of a creditor except by reason of a default, as defined in sub. (2) .

(2)  “Default", with respect to a consumer credit transaction, means without justification under any law:

(a) With respect to a transaction other than one pursuant to an open-end plan and except as provided in par. (am) ; if the interval between scheduled payments is 2 months or less, to have outstanding an amount exceeding one full payment which has remained unpaid for more than 10 days after the scheduled or deferred due dates, or the failure to pay the first payment or the last payment, within 40 days of its scheduled or deferred due date; if the interval between scheduled payments is more than 2 months, to have all or any part of one scheduled payment unpaid for more than 60 days after its scheduled or deferred due date; or, if the transaction is scheduled to be repaid in a single payment, to have all or any part of the payment unpaid for more than 40 days after its scheduled or deferred due date. For purposes of this paragraph the amount outstanding shall not include any delinquency or deferral charges and shall be computed by applying each payment first to the installment most delinquent and then to subsequent installments in the order they come due;

(am) With respect to an installment loan not secured by a motor vehicle made by a licensee under s. 138.09 or with respect to a payday loan not secured by a motor vehicle made by a licensee under s. 138.14 ; to have outstanding an amount of one full payment or more which has remained unpaid for more than 10 days after the scheduled or deferred due date. For purposes of this paragraph the amount outstanding shall not include any delinquency or deferral charges and shall be computed by applying each payment first to the installment most delinquent and then to subsequent installments in the order they come due;

(b) With respect to an open-end plan, failure to pay when due on 2 occasions within any 12-month period;

(bm) With respect to a motor vehicle consumer lease or a consumer credit sale of a motor vehicle, making a material false statement in the customer's credit application that precedes the consumer credit transaction; or

(c) To observe any other covenant of the transaction, breach of which materially impairs the condition, value or protection of or the merchant's right in any collateral securing the transaction or goods subject to a consumer lease, or materially impairs the customer's ability to pay amounts due under the transaction.

(3)  A cause of action with respect to the obligation of a customer in a consumer credit transaction shall be subject to this subchapter, including the provisions relating to cure of default ( ss. 425.104 and 425.105 ).

(4)  A cause of action arising from a transaction which resulted in the creation of a security interest in personal property shall also be subject to the limitations provided in subch. II .

1971 c. 239 ; 1973 c. 3 ; 1975 c. 407 ; 1979 c. 10 ; 1995 a. 225 ; 1997 a. 302 ; 2005 a. 110 ; 2013 a. 20 . When a lender was promptly informed that a borrower had a valid disability insurance claim that would cover payments, it was an unconscionable practice to include an unpaid monthly charge that would be covered by the disability insurance in computing the unpaid balance for purposes of establishing default. Bank One Milwaukee, N.A. v. Harris, 209 Wis. 2d 412 , 563 N.W.2d 543 (Ct. App. 1997), 96-0903 . Under sub. (2) (a), when payments are scheduled less than 2 months apart, a consumer is in default when an amount greater than one full payment remains unpaid for over 10 days, not when a single payment is unpaid for more than 10 days. Indianhead Motors v. Brooks, 2006 WI App 266 , 297 Wis. 2d 821 , 726 N.W.2d 352 , 06-1002 . This section does not create a right for consumers to enforce when a merchant includes a particular provision in a loan agreement. Rather, it limits the circumstances in which a merchant can sue a customer for defaulting on a loan. Nelson v. Santander Consumer USA, Inc. 931 F. Supp. 2d 919 (2013). Creditor's remedies under the Wisconsin consumer act. 1973 WBB No. 6.