Section 980.03. Rights of persons subject to petition.  


Latest version.
  • (1)  The circuit court in which a petition under s. 980.02 is filed shall conduct all hearings under this chapter. The court shall give the person who is the subject of the petition reasonable notice of the time and place of each such hearing. The court may designate additional persons to receive these notices.
    (2)  Except as provided in ss. 980.038 (2) and 980.09 and without limitation by enumeration, at any hearing under this chapter, the person who is the subject of the petition has the right to:
    (a) Counsel. If the person claims or appears to be indigent, the court shall refer the person to the authority for indigency determinations under s. 977.07 (1) and, if applicable, the appointment of counsel.
    (b) Remain silent.
    (c) Present and cross-examine witnesses.
    (d) Have the hearing recorded by a court reporter.
    (3)  The person who is the subject of the petition, the person's attorney, or the petitioner may request that a trial under s. 980.05 be to a jury. A request for a jury trial shall be made as provided under s. 980.05 (2) . Notwithstanding s. 980.05 (2) , if the person, the person's attorney, or the petitioner does not request a jury trial, the court may on its own motion require that the trial be to a jury. The jury shall be selected as provided under s. 980.05 (2m) . A verdict of a jury under this chapter is not valid unless it is unanimous.
1993 a. 479 ; 1997 a. 252 ; 1999 a. 9 ; 2005 a. 434 . There are circumstances when comment on the defendant's silence is permitted. If a defendant refuses to be interviewed by the state's psychologist and the defense attorney challenges the psychologist's findings based on the lack of an interview, it is appropriate for the psychologist to testify about the refusal. State v. Adams, 223 Wis. 2d 60 , 588 N.W.2d 336 (Ct. App. 1998), 96-3136 . If all jurors agree that the defendant suffers from a mental disease, unanimity requirements are met even if the jurors disagree on the disease that predisposes the defendant to reoffend. State v. Pletz, 2000 WI App 221 , 239 Wis. 2d 49 , 619 N.W.2d 97 , 98-2455 . Chapter 980 provides its own procedures for commencing actions, and, as such, chs. 801 and 802 are inapplicable to the commencement of ch. 980 actions. State v. Wolfe, 2001 WI App 136 , 246 Wis. 2d 233 , 631 N.W.2d 240 , 99-2145 . The circuit court must appoint an examiner for the court under sub. (3) regardless of whether the court also appointed an examiner for the petitioner under sub. (4), 2001 stats. An indigent party petitioning for supervised release is not entitled under sub. (4), 2001 stats., to an examiner of his or her choice, but is entitled to a "qualified and available" court-appointed examiner. Requirements for a qualified examiner are discussed. State v. Thiel, 2004 WI App 225 , 277 Wis. 2d 698 , 691 N.W.2d 388 , 03-2649 .