Section 885.60. Use in criminal cases and proceedings under chapters 48, 51

  , 55 , 938 , and 980 .

(1)  Subject to the standards and criteria set forth in ss. 885.54 and 885.56 and to the limitations of sub. (2) , a circuit court may, on its own motion or at the request of any party, in any criminal case or matter under chs. 48 , 51 , 55 , 938 , or 980 , permit the use of videoconferencing technology in any pre-trial, trial or fact-finding, or post-trial proceeding.

(2)  

(a) Except as may otherwise be provided by law, a defendant in a criminal case and a respondent in a matter listed in sub. (1) is entitled to be physically present in the courtroom at all trials and sentencing or dispositional hearings.

(b) A proponent of a witness via videoconferencing technology at any evidentiary hearing, trial, or fact-finding hearing shall file a notice of intention to present testimony by videoconference technology 20 days prior to the scheduled start of the proceeding. Any other party may file an objection to the testimony of a witness by videoconference technology within 10 days of the filing of the notice of intention. If the time limits of the proceeding do not permit the time periods provided for in this paragraph, the court may in its discretion shorten the time to file notice of intention and objection.

(c) If an objection is made by the plaintiff or petitioner in a matter listed in sub. (1) , the court shall determine the objection in the exercise of its discretion under the criteria set forth in s. 885.56 .

(d) If an objection is made by the defendant or respondent in a matter listed in sub. (1) , regarding any proceeding where he or she is entitled to be physically present in the courtroom, the court shall sustain the objection. For all other proceedings in a matter listed in sub. (1) , the court shall determine the objection in the exercise of its discretion under the criteria set forth in s. 885.56 .

Sup. Ct. Order No. 07-12 , 2008 WI 37, 305 Wis. 2d xli; 2011 a. 32 . Comment, 2008: ? It is the intent of s. 885.60 to scrupulously protect the rights of criminal defendants and respondents in matters which could result in loss of liberty or fundamental rights with respect to their children by preserving to such litigants the right to be physically present in court at all critical stages of their proceedings. This section also protects such litigants' rights to adequate representation by counsel by eliminating the potential problems that might arise where counsel and litigants are either physically separated, or counsel are with litigants at remote locations and not present in court. "Critical stages of the proceedings" is not defined under this section, but incorporates existing law as well as new law as it is adopted or decided. This section is not intended to create new rights in litigants to be physically present which they do not otherwise possess; it is intended merely to preserve such rights, and to avoid abrogating by virtue of the adoption of this subchapter any such rights. This section is also intended to preserve constitutional and other rights to confront and effectively cross-examine witnesses. It provides the right to prevent the use of videoconferencing technology to present such adverse witnesses, but rather require that such witnesses be physically produced in the courtroom. In requiring a defendant's objection to the use of videoconferencing to be sustained, this section also preserves the defendant's speedy trial rights intact. Objections by the State or petitioner to the use of videoconferencing technology to present defense witnesses are resolved by the court in the same manner as provided in civil cases and special proceedings under ss. 885.54 and 885.56.